I have just moved and rotated a section of the pattern, which all worked perfectly. However, I need to add a line from before the move/rotate to get a 2nd point to line up in the pattern, so I went to the History tab to add this line before the rotation and got this error:
After clicking on the OK, the program terminates as the message says it will. When I reopen the pattern, it opens perfectly, however, every time I click on the History, the same thing happens.
OS is Windows 10 & the release is the latest - 2022-01-10:
Another thing that I am noticing on my patterns is that there are a lot of duplicate node labels. This could really not have happened during the time of drafting the original pattern, the program would never have allowed it:
Hmmm… generally we never get an error msg so specific. Already see the problem… should be using the rotation point (a UInt, not the rotation angle a real double).
Fixed this issue. Might be in the next release tonight? BTW… going through the history with your pattern I decided that the history dialog could use some improvement. With a large number of items it gets really difficult to find any given item in the list.
I looked a bit into the duplicate point names… bit baffled at the moment. I’ll keep digging.
Thank you very much, I’m going to download it now. Don’t worry about these. This is quite an old pattern which I don’t use any more. I’ll let you know if I notice it again.
I’ve tried opening a bunch of old patterns to see if it will happen again, but it doesn’t. It’s only this pattern. So it could be that I manually imported the sleeve into this pattern and didn’t ‘fix’ the labels and the program didn’t throw out an error, so it went unnoticed. I get up to all sorts of things, so anything is possible.
Aha… that would do it. I’m a bit surprised that the app doesn’t throw an error / warning when parsing the pattern during loading. I guess the “uniqueness” is only checked during creation.
That being said… the pattern was throwing errors when I was trying to add points and it would come up with the no object Id #xx.
